Kejan Haynes
Lead Editor - Newsgathering
kejan.haynes@guardian.co.tt
Former commissioner of police and national security minister Gary Griffith has criticised the abrupt withdrawal of former prime minister Stuart Young’s state security detail, calling the move unprofessional and potentially dangerous.
“In fact, such an immediate removal is unprofessional, classless, and lacks any form of security professionalism,” Griffith said.
“The proper protocol is for the individual to be reliably informed, usually by the CoP, and told that, based on a threat assessment, the detail would be removed in a few days or weeks. This provides ample time for the individual to adjust their lifestyle, including acquiring their own security if they see fit.”
Young was meeting constituents in his Port-of-Spain North/St Ann’s West office on Tuesday when Special Branch officers assigned to him reportedly received instructions to stand down immediately, almost leaving him without transport. Young confirmed the security was pulled without warning.
Griffith urged the public to look beyond partisan reaction and understand the protocols involved.
“Most Government supporters will undoubtedly praise the decision with highly charged comments such as ‘it’s good for them,’ while those opposed to the Government will condemn it, seeing it solely as an act of vindictiveness.”
In an interview with Guardian Media on Tuesday, Commissioner of Police Allister Guevarro confirmed he received a directive from Cabinet and “acted with promptitude,” but Griffith warned that Cabinet should only make recommendations and not issue instructions regarding security details.
“I am not saying that this was done in this specific situation, but if it is, it forces the CoP to adhere to an instruction to remove security without a proper threat assessment being done on the subject.” Griffith said.
“This breaches the CoP’s oath of office to properly and impartially secure each and every citizen, and effectively turns the CoP into a tool of politicians, which is not recommended.”
The senior Cabinet official who confirmed the removal of security at the time, said the latest threat assessment found no ongoing risk to Young saying the police could now be “placed back into the street or attached to someone else.”
Former prime minister Rowley, who also lost his security a few weeks ago, said he didn’t have security until Griffith made the assessment during his time as National Security Minister and ensured he was provided with a detail.
He said he was “appalled to find that the Leader of the Opposition had no form of State security” and recommended protection be assigned, since that person is viewed as “the alternate Prime Minister” and a high-risk public figure. He said even though other Government officials at the time objected, the then Commissioner of Police agreed, and for the first time outside an election period, the Opposition Leader received a dedicated security detail.
“This decision was based on logic and an understanding of security, removing the previous pettiness of prioritising emotional political views over doing what is right.” Griffith said.
He said the new precedent meant that when Rowley became prime minister and Kamla Persad-Bissessar assumed the role of opposition leader in 2015, Rowley’s security detail then automatically became Persad-Bissessar’s security detail as opposition leader.
In an interview with Guardian Media, Griffith noted that Persad-Bissessar had this protection from 2015 to 2018, before he became commissioner of police. He added that when he took over as commissioner, the security detail assigned to her was “a skeleton staff,” but “based on intelligence I received, I actually increased her security detail as opposition leader whilst I was Commissioner of Police.”
Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles still retains her state-provided security detail.