JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

State to appeal ruling - AG

by

2008 days ago
20200114

Office of the Parliament

The state will ap­peal Jus­tice Frank Seep­er­sad’s sedi­tion rul­ing, as At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Faris Al Rawi has claimed the rul­ing could have a rip­ple ef­fect with se­ri­ous im­pli­ca­tions con­cern­ing oth­er in­her­it­ed laws from our colo­nial past.

“I’ve in­struct­ed the state’s at­tor­neys, to take an ur­gent and im­me­di­ate ap­peal and asked for an ex­pe­dit­ed hear­ing at the court of ap­peal for this par­tic­u­lar mat­ter,” said Al Rawi in a press con­fer­ence yes­ter­day.

“Be­cause of the prece­dent that it would set on every saved law that ap­plies in this coun­try. Be it the law that al­lows cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, to be pun­ished by death by hang­ing or be it the law that pro­tects se­cre­cy pro­vi­sions in the in­land rev­enue act. In the in­come tax leg­is­la­tion. Sec­tion four, for in­stance, says there is strict con­fi­den­tial­i­ty etc so this law has wide-reach­ing con­se­quences. The judge­ment has wide-reach­ing con­se­quences and it must be ap­pealed as a mat­ter of im­me­di­a­cy and as a mat­ter of im­por­tance,” he said, ex­plain­ing that the rul­ing could cause these oth­er laws which were saved laws from pre-in­de­pen­dence could be struck out on sim­i­lar grounds.

Al Rawi said while he ac­knowl­edged the call for con­sti­tu­tion­al re­form made by Jus­tice Seep­er­sad in the judge­ment, he said the law still had an ef­fec­tive us­age in our post-monar­chy democ­ra­cy.

“The judge re­ferred us to the fact that we have no longer have a monar­chy and in­stead the coun­try was ef­fec­tive­ly ruled by the peo­ple. I want to re­mind that this coun­try has in its his­to­ry ri­ot-us con­se­quences which are much more than pre-in­de­pen­dence ri­ots. In 1990, we saw the at­tempt­ed coup in Trinidad and To­ba­go and we can­not for­get our past. We al­so have to be very mind­ful of where the di­vi­sion be­tween free­dom of ex­pres­sion comes against main­tain­ing law and or­der,” he said.

The AG read the ex­cerpt of the late Sat Ma­haraj’s state­ment which prompt­ed the sedi­tion charge and raised the ques­tion as to where the line of free­dom of ex­pres­sion should be drawn giv­en the po­ten­tial of vi­o­lence.

“This case sim­ply en­cap­su­lates where we are as a so­ci­ety be­lieve where the line ought to be drawn. It is im­por­tant to re­mem­ber that free­dom of ex­pres­sion has lim­its,” he said.

This par­tic­u­lar case em­bod­ies the par­tic­u­lar dis­cus­sion in our so­ci­ety as to what is the di­vid­ing line be­tween law and or­der.”

“This judge­ment to­day is one that has to be ap­pealed, must be set­tled by the high­est court which is the privy coun­cil and I just want to alert the coun­try that the gov­ern­ment strict in­ter­pre­ta­tion, strict rule is that there must be an ex­pe­dit­ed hear­ing of an ap­peal. We will ap­ply for that and fi­nal­ly that it is to be set­tled by no less a court than the privy coun­cil,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored