JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 21, 2025

Storming the Venezuela debate

by

Wesley Gibbings
2309 days ago
20190326

As ir­re­sistible as the temp­ta­tion to sub­ject the Prime Min­is­ter's full-page ad on Sun­day to Com­mon En­trance stan­dards (as it has), there is some­thing in the mes­sage to which much more at­ten­tion needs to be paid.

It is that in this coun­try’s deal­ings with the rest of the world, in the post-in­de­pen­dence era, we have nev­er tend­ed to be short on self-es­teem and con­fi­dence.

I re­mem­ber for­mer for­eign min­is­ter Ralph Maraj at one Cari­com meet­ing some years ago de­clar­ing that achieve­ment of strong re­gion­al uni­ty had the po­ten­tial to po­si­tion the Caribbean “at the cen­tre of the uni­verse”.

Ja­maicans in the au­di­ence must have opined that the de­c­la­ra­tion of “we lick­le but we tallawah” had ap­par­ent­ly been sub­ject­ed to a mas­sive dose of steroids on that par­tic­u­lar oc­ca­sion.

But it has not all been a eu­phor­ic delu­sion. Sun­day’s full-page state­ment sent me back to Paul K Sut­ton’s com­pi­la­tion of speech­es by the late prime min­is­ter Dr Er­ic Williams. There I found far more elo­quent ex­pres­sion of the ap­pli­ca­tion of po­lit­i­cal “self-de­ter­mi­na­tion” as a ba­sis for en­light­ened, strate­gic in­ser­tion in­to the man­age­ment of in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs.

Dr Williams, you see, was able to nu­ance mul­ti­ple tiers of en­gage­ment at the re­gion­al, hemi­spher­ic and glob­al lev­els. He did so by sug­gest­ing that it is quite pos­si­ble to find our way in the world (how­ev­er clum­si­ly at times) as a small, sov­er­eign is­land state with a mind of our own.

There were his ob­ser­va­tions about the emer­gence of the Non-Aligned Move­ment in the ear­ly 60s. He not­ed that T&T had been “more non-aligned that most of its col­leagues (and ex­er­cis­ing) the great­est cir­cum­spec­tion in avoid­ing in­ter­fer­ence in the af­fairs or oth­ers”.

Dr Williams was al­so clear that, on the ques­tion of self-con­fi­dence, de­vel­op­ing na­tions had to shape their des­tinies based “in the­o­ry and in prac­tice, on an ac­tive role for the pas­sive par­tic­i­pants of pre­vi­ous cen­turies.”

Of course, the re­al ex­perts can add oth­er lev­els of in­ter­pre­ta­tion and analy­sis but, to me, there is a clear con­nec­tion be­tween the late prime min­is­ter’s as­ser­tions and Sun­day’s clum­si­ly-con­struct­ed yet im­por­tant trea­tise.

There are, of course, those who con­clude that be­ing “force-ripe” on for­eign pol­i­cy has no place in the mod­ern con­text and that there are mat­ters over which our in­puts have ab­solute­ly no force or mean­ing. The same peo­ple al­so typ­i­cal­ly sug­gest that the in­de­pen­dence project, when it comes to for­eign pol­i­cy, has been a mean­ing­less farce.

This, I be­lieve, was the ques­tion be­ing ad­dressed by Sun­day’s text which en­cap­su­lat­ed last week’s “taller and proud­er” pro­nounce­ments by the prime min­is­ter.

But the PM’s ad ap­peared, iron­i­cal­ly, a day af­ter Venezue­lan op­po­si­tion politi­cian, Juan Guaidó scooped the Caribbean me­dia and some re­gion­al diplo­mats via Twit­ter. He did so by an­nounc­ing the out­come of an on­line meet­ing with se­lect­ed Cari­com min­is­ters of for­eign af­fairs, in­clud­ing our own.

The meet­ing, he said, was meant to dis­cuss the “cri­sis” in his coun­try and his vi­sion for the way for­ward. Be­fore then, the meet­ing had in­ex­plic­a­bly re­mained unan­nounced. It ap­peared, based on his re­luc­tant com­ment to the press, that for­eign min­is­ter Den­nis Moses had been re­ly­ing sole­ly on a bland Cari­com press re­lease to re­port pre­lim­i­nar­i­ly on the out­come.

Un­der no cir­cum­stances is this ac­cept­able. The T&T pop­u­la­tion and me­dia are not a set of “storm­ers” to this process.

Mean­while, Dr Williams was not known to be par­tic­u­lar­ly fond of suc­ces­sive Venezue­lan ad­min­is­tra­tions. Sut­ton’s com­pi­la­tion es­tab­lish­es that. One (now de­ceased) for­mer se­nior diplo­mat once told me Williams’ feel­ings ex­ceed­ed a mere ab­sence of fond­ness.

The Twit­ter re­spons­es to Guaidó’s Sun­day scoop in­clud­ed words such as “san­gui­jue­las” (leech­es) and “chu­los” (pimps) when de­scrib­ing Cari­com’s role in the cur­rent im­broglio. His han­dlers had bet­ter watch it.

At a PNM par­ty con­ven­tion in 1975, Dr Williams ex­pand­ed on what he termed “Venezue­lan pen­e­tra­tion of the Caribbean” with ref­er­ence to de­bates at the time over that coun­try’s ex­clu­sive eco­nom­ic zone and its ter­ri­to­r­i­al claim over Guyana’s Es­se­qui­bo re­gion, among oth­ers.

The po­lit­i­cal com­plex­ion at the Pala­cio de Mi­raflo­res had not mat­tered then when it came to these things. This has not changed. The prime min­is­ter’s pre­scribed prag­ma­tism seems per­fect­ly in or­der. But his for­eign min­is­ter needs to lis­ten more close­ly to the in­tend­ed mes­sage.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored