Sports have the potential to serve as a social control strategy of deviance and violence among the youth population.
However, the sport intervention strategies have to be part of a holistic socio-economic package designed to address the social problems in the communities where social deviance and violence is most likely to occur. Ergo, the leadership competencies of the administrators, coordinators, and coaches have to be of the highest quality with the support of parents, relatives and guardians.
The benefits of sports participation cover a range of important areas of youth development. The youth can benefit from developing a habit of involvement in physical activity which can extend throughout her/his lifetime. A physical activity habit also has the potential of improving the fitness level of the youth. In addition to direct sport and physical activity benefits, youth involvement in sport can also contribute to establishing important prosocial and emotional skills, moral values and high levels of self-esteem.
Through basketball, The 'Hoop of Life' project was aimed at social control of 'youth at risk' in crime 'hotspot' areas throughout the country. The LifeSport programme was also directed at young males at 'risk' of engaging in socially questionable lifestyles. Lennox Bernard's 'Give a Sporting Chance,' in his contribution to the Ryan Report (2013) “No Time to Quit: Engaging Youth At Risk,” also addressed the potential of sports as a mechanism of addressing social deviance. Each of these projects will be analysed from a sporting perspective in subsequent columns.
However, any attempt to effectively use sport as a means of addressing 'youth at risk' requires an analytical framework to assess deviance and collect robust and reliable data to constantly evaluate the overall programme. To date, there has been much conversation about the use of sports programmes but there has been little strategic information forthcoming of how strategies are to be designed, implemented and measured. For instance who is defined as 'youth at risk'? Will there be continuity of the programmes if sponsored by the state and government changes?
There are several important questions that have to be addressed such as what conclusive evidence exists that supports sport as the potential answer to the variety of social issues facing young people today? Can it be said with assurance that sport is the best means to inculcate important life skills? Is sport the focus? Are there other programmes already existing to which the resources could be combined to provide greater opportunity to the participants? Is the technical expertise of sports psychologists, social workers etc to be used in conjunction with coaches and other sports officials?
It must not be assumed that playing sport automatically results in a person being an effective coach or mentor especially when dealing with 'youth at risk'. How are the programmes to be measured in terms of outcomes? Is the implementation approach top-down or collaborative where participants are part of the decision-making process? How is data to be collected and used in the re-evaluation of the programmes?
If the problems facing 'youth at risk' are related to structured economic decline and inequalities in the communities identified, why is there a belief that organized youth sports programmes will solve the many problems? In other words, if at the end of the day the youth has to return to social and economic conditions that do not allow him/her to use his newly acquired skills, what is the justification for the programme on its own?
As much as the intention may be good, it is important that those who want to use sport as a means of quieting social deviance, to remember that sport is only a tool in the development process and as such must not be expected to produce miracles on its own.
"I don't feel it is necessary to know exactly what I am. The main interest in life and work is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning." Michel Foucault
