JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

Hinds clarifies discussion with Giffith on returning to work

by

1386 days ago
20210917
Minister of National Security and Member of Parliament for Laventille West, Fitzgerald Hinds, responds to a matter on the Motion for the Adjournment on the need for the Government to explain the legal basis for its decision to appoint a two-member Committee comprising private citizens, to investigate allegations of misconduct against senior members of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

Minister of National Security and Member of Parliament for Laventille West, Fitzgerald Hinds, responds to a matter on the Motion for the Adjournment on the need for the Government to explain the legal basis for its decision to appoint a two-member Committee comprising private citizens, to investigate allegations of misconduct against senior members of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENT

Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Fitzger­ald Hinds said yes­ter­day that he told act­ing Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er Gary Grif­fith to re­main “at bay” un­til the ex­pi­ra­tion of his leave on Sep­tem­ber 20.

Hinds con­firmed that in the Sen­ate last night.

He was re­ply­ing to a mo­tion on the ad­journ­ment by UNC Sen­a­tor Wade Mark who had said there was a need for Gov­ern­ment to ex­plain the le­gal ba­sis for its de­ci­sion to ap­point a two-mem­ber com­mit­tee com­pris­ing pri­vate cit­i­zens to in­ves­ti­gate al­le­ga­tions of mis­con­duct against se­nior TTPS of­fi­cers.

Mark al­so said a plan has been “hatched in PNM’s Bal­isi­er House“ head­quar­ters to re­move Grif­fith. He said he was sur­prised to find yes­ter­day that the plot had “thick­ened” and he queried why Hinds had called on Grif­fith “not to re­port for du­ty un­til fur­ther no­tice.”

Mark said that wasn’t Hinds’ re­spon­si­bil­i­ty but was the re­spon­si­bil­i­ty of the Po­lice Ser­vice Com­mis­sion. Mark said if Hinds had re­al­ly told Grif­fith that he had to re­sign im­me­di­ate­ly.

But Hinds, de­tail­ing what oc­curred, said, “To sug­gest as Mark did, that this Min­is­ter told (Grif­fith) that he should not re­turn to his desk be­yond Sep­tem­ber 20 is clear­ly miss­ing the mark as he (Mark) al­ways does.”

Hinds said Grif­fith had writ­ten him sug­gest­ing that he re­turn to work ap­prox­i­mate­ly one week or some­time be­fore he was due to re­turn from a pe­ri­od of leave.

He said the leave was ap­plied for and Grif­fith ap­plied to him as Min­is­ter as in nor­mal cir­cum­stances and the Po­lice Ser­vice Com­mis­sion was in­formed. The leave was ap­proved.

Hinds said Grif­fith re­turned ap­prox­i­mate­ly one week be­fore it was due to ex­pire and asked Hinds the fol­low­ing day if he should re­turn to his desk.

“I told him I would re­vert as I need­ed to un­der­stand the im­pli­ca­tions of that for his ap­proved leave. Be­fore I could re­turn to him I be­came aware that he wrote sim­i­lar­ly to the PSC and the PSC re­spond­ed to him sug­gest­ing that is a mat­ter for the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter.”

“And it is on the ba­sis of those two bits of cor­re­spon­dence which hav­ing called the CoP, he ac­knowl­edged dis­patch­ing to the ser­vice com­mis­sion and ac­knowl­edged the re­ply that he was aware that I had re­ceived. It was on the ba­sis of that I told him he should re­main on leave up to the ex­pi­ra­tion of same on Sep­tem­ber 20.”

Hinds said the Min­istry’s per­ma­nent sec­re­tary was present with him at the time and his phone “as nor­mal­ly is the case was on loud­speak­er.”

“So the PS of the NS Min­istry over­heard every­thing in the con­ver­sa­tion.”

He said he told the CoP and re­peat­ed it twice to make it “pel­lu­cid­ly clear suf­fi­cient for any child to un­der­stand....’I am speak­ing about you stay­ing at bay un­til the ex­pi­ra­tion of your leave.”

Hinds said Grif­fith ac­knowl­edged that and went off the phone.

Grif­fith, mean­while, al­leged, “the Min­is­ter told me that he would like for me to re­main on leave un­til fur­ther no­tice.”

How­ev­er, ar­gued that Hinds was ill-ad­vised to do so.

“Un­for­tu­nate­ly who­ev­er ad­vised the Min­is­ter gave him wrong ad­vice be­cause a Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty does not have the au­thor­i­ty to send any po­lice of­fi­cer on leave based on the law and ob­vi­ous rea­sons that a politi­cian can­not di­rect the po­lice in such a way.”

“This has to be done through the PSC and the PSC is ful­ly aware of their role and func­tion where you can­not send some­one on leave un­less of course there’s a dis­ci­pli­nary mat­ter or there is some in­ves­ti­ga­tion that is tak­ing place by rel­e­vant law en­force­ment au­thor­i­ties,” Grif­fith added.

Mean­while, Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Mooni­lal said Pres­i­dent Paula Mae Weekes must im­me­di­ate­ly in­ter­vene and ask mem­bers of the PSC whether they have tak­en in­struc­tions from a politi­cian.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored