JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

Maha Sabha wants lawsuit info on reinstatement of teacher

by

582 days ago
20231201
Eleanor Donaldson-Honeywell

Eleanor Donaldson-Honeywell

Derek Achong

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

The Sanatan Dhar­ma Ma­ha Sab­ha (SDMS) has re­quest­ed the dis­clo­sure of doc­u­ments re­lat­ed to a law­suit which re­sult­ed in the re­in­state­ment of a long-serv­ing teacher, who turned down a pro­mo­tion to be a prin­ci­pal of one of its pri­ma­ry schools due to her daugh­ter’s med­ical con­di­tion be­fore hav­ing a change of heart days lat­er.

Last Wednes­day, High Court Judge Eleanor Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well or­dered the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion and the Teach­ing Ser­vice Com­mis­sion (TSC) to re­in­state In­dra Ram­datt-Jagdeo as prin­ci­pal of the Hap­py Hill SDMS Pri­ma­ry School in Gas­par­il­lo ef­fec­tive Jan­u­ary 2, next year.

In a let­ter to TSC chair­man, Eliz­a­beth Crouch, sent yes­ter­day and ob­tained by Guardian Me­dia, the SDMS’s lawyer Di­nesh Ram­bal­ly said his client on­ly be­came aware of what tran­spired based on news­pa­per re­ports.

Ram­bal­ly re­quest­ed the dis­clo­sure of Ram­datt-Jagdeo’s court fil­ings and al­so en­quired whether its views on the is­sue, com­mu­ni­cat­ed to the min­istry and the com­mis­sion in nu­mer­ous cor­re­spon­dence, formed part of the ev­i­dence in the case.

He not­ed that short­ly af­ter Ram­datt-Jagdeo re­signed, it rec­om­mend­ed an­oth­er teacher at the school to act in the po­si­tion.

He al­so point­ed out that his client stood by its rec­om­men­da­tion of the oth­er teacher when the com­mis­sion con­tact it in Sep­tem­ber to ex­press the view that Ram­datt-Jagdeo’s ap­point­ment was still valid.

“The SDMS’s pri­ma­ry con­cern has al­ways been and con­tin­ues to be the safe­ty of stu­dents, the over­all sta­bil­i­ty and suc­cess of the school,” Ram­bal­ly said.

Ac­cord­ing to her court fil­ings in April, Ram­datt-Jagdeo took up a pro­mo­tion to be the prin­ci­pal of the school.

Ram­datt-Jagdeo, who is a wid­ow and has been a sin­gle par­ent to her two chil­dren for the past 15 years, claimed that around the time she took up the ap­point­ment the health of her daugh­ter, who has a spinal birth de­fect, be­gan to wors­en.

She claimed that she was dis­tressed and had doubts over her abil­i­ty to take on the pro­mo­tion based on her daugh­ter’s de­te­ri­o­rat­ing con­di­tion and the fact that she (her daugh­ter) was due to un­der­go a risky pro­ce­dure which could re­sult in her be­ing paral­ysed from the neck down.

In late April, she ten­dered her res­ig­na­tion based on al­leged ad­vice from an un­named of­fi­cial of the TSC as she claimed that she was un­der the im­pres­sion that she could re­sume her du­ties as a teacher af­ter.

Her res­ig­na­tion let­ter was on­ly re­ceived sev­er­al days lat­er when it was stamped by a school su­per­vi­sor.

Two days lat­er, Ram­datt-Jagdeo had a change of heart and wrote to the min­istry seek­ing to re­scind her pre­vi­ous cor­re­spon­dence.

While min­istry of­fi­cials al­leged­ly in­di­cat­ed that the with­draw­al of her res­ig­na­tion could be fa­cil­i­tat­ed based on the short time line, she was lat­er in­formed that this was not pos­si­ble due to re­sis­tance from the school’s de­nom­i­na­tion­al board.

Ram­datt-Jagdeo claimed that she met with board of­fi­cials, who in­di­cat­ed that they pre­ferred that she did not re­turn to the post based on her in­de­ci­sive­ness.

She claimed that she was forced to file the law­suit af­ter she at­tempt­ed to rec­ti­fy the sit­u­a­tion with the min­istry to no avail.

In her court fil­ings, Ram­datt-Jagdeo’s lawyers from Free­dom Law Cham­bers claimed that she is re­gret­ful for the in­con­ve­nience caused by the ini­tial let­ter.

“With­in two days she sub­mit­ted the let­ter of re­trac­tion, yet she has been left in a state of abeyance and lim­bo when she has not been ap­point­ed to serve in an of­fice in the teach­ing ser­vice. This has caused her se­vere hard­ship, much stress and grave in­con­ve­nience,” they said.

Through the law­suit, Ram­datt-Jagdeo was seek­ing a de­c­la­ra­tion that she was treat­ed un­fair­ly and con­trary to the prin­ci­ples of nat­ur­al jus­tice.

Jus­tice Don­ald­son-Hon­ey­well is­sued the or­der as the min­istry and the com­mis­sion re­port­ed­ly con­ced­ed the case.

She al­so or­dered that the min­istry con­tin­ue to pay Ram­datt-Jagdeo her salary and ben­e­fits as a school prin­ci­pal.

The TSC and the min­istry were al­so or­dered to pay her le­gal costs for pur­su­ing the case.

Ram­datt-Jagdeo was rep­re­sent­ed by Anand Ram­lo­gan, SC, Jayan­ti Lutch­me­di­al, Kent Sam­lal, Natasha Bis­ram, Vishaal Siewsaran, and Jared Ja­groo.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored