JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

Where is the oil spill report?

by

20150823

Where is the re­port of the Na­tion­al En­vi­ron­men­tal As­sess­ment Task Force (NEATF) that was promised by Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar in Jan­u­ary, 2014 to ad­dress the en­vi­ron­men­tal im­pact of the De­cem­ber 2013 Petrotrin oil spill that dev­as­tat­ed Trinidad's South West Penin­su­la?En­vi­ron­men­tal ad­vo­ca­cy group Fish­er­men and Friends of the Sea (FFOS) put in a Free­dom of In­for­ma­tion Act re­quest for a copy of the re­port on Au­gust 14, 2014.

On Ju­ly 10, 2015, al­most a year lat­er, the Per­ma­nent Sec­re­tary of the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter replied to FFOS that the re­quest for the re­port was de­nied.The Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter ex­plained by a tem­plate let­ter, with tick-box­es, that the NEATF re­port re­ceived a Cer­tifi­cate of Ex­emp­tion be­cause it is "a doc­u­ment which has been con­sid­ered by Cab­i­net and which is re­lat­ed to an is­sue that is or has been be­fore Cab­i­net."

This is not an ad­e­quate re­sponse from a trans­par­ent, de­mo­c­ra­t­ic gov­ern­ment re­gard­ing the im­pact of what is T&T's most de­struc­tive en­vi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ter. Is it a cov­er-up by the State of a State owned com­pa­ny caused dis­as­ter? Or is it that the re­port was nev­er com­plet­ed?One of the peo­ple ask­ing why the Prime Min­is­ter's promise is not be­ing kept is Wayne Hen­ry, a 50-some­thing year-old fish­er­man of La Brea.

Hen­ry has lived and fished there all his life. He told me: "Since the first set of oil spill we have been get­ting fish kills. Por­poise have washed up dead. EMA have come here. They don't give us any in­for­ma­tion. Peo­ple from the uni­ver­si­ty came here but when we called them they nev­er told us any­thing."

The lack of in­for­ma­tion breeds dis­trust. Hen­ry said: "I don't know what it is that they are try­ing to hide."Hen­ry re­ports that, in the space of one week, six dead pel­i­cans were found on Cof­fee Beach, La Brea. This is the beach where cur­rents car­ried huge amounts of oil dur­ing the spill. A dead fish hawk, a dol­phin and thou­sands of fish al­so washed up dur­ing the week. Hen­ry thinks that it has to do with re­cent heavy rains that flushed out the oil-spilled, dis­per­sant treat­ed man­groves.

An­oth­er res­i­dent, an el­der­ly gen­tle­man, told me that he be­lieves that the fish and an­i­mal kills are caused by pol­lut­ing in­dus­tries in Point Lisas. He ex­plains that cur­rents car­ry the dead fish to Cof­fee beach.A third lo­cal says that Cof­fee beach has al­ways suf­fered from dead fish wash­ing up on­shore. He be­lieves that it is caused by up-cur­rent fish­er folk dis­card­ing un­want­ed by­catch.

A fourth res­i­dent fish­er thinks it is a com­bi­na­tion of all of the above caus­es.He says that some­times the fish are alive but jerk­ing and flop­ping about, gasp­ing for air, when they are suf­fer­ing from some kind of tox­ic ef­fect. Oth­er times they are dead be­fore they hit the shore in which case he thinks they were dis­card­ed by­catch.

Is it caused by the oil spill or not? They don't know. They have lit­tle ed­u­ca­tion and all they can do is make a cal­cu­lat­ed guess. The true ex­perts are the mem­bers of the Na­tion­al En­vi­ron­men­tal As­sess­ment Task Force (NEATF).They, how­ev­er, re­main silent. Those who know the most say the least.

Walk­ing around the vil­lage at Cof­fee Beach res­i­dents point out dis­cards of the oil spill that was nev­er re­moved. Be­hind and un­der­neath one house was a bagasse-type ma­te­r­i­al that was used to soak up crude oil. The clean-up ef­fort was nev­er cleaned.

I took a look at near­by man­groves. Or­ange booms still lit­tered the man­grove. These were placed there to pre­vent oil from pen­e­trat­ing the del­i­cate man­grove for­est. It looks like once me­dia at­ten­tion was di­vert­ed from the spill Petrotrin and the agen­cies re­spon­si­ble for the clean-up washed their hands of the whole event, as if it nev­er hap­pened.

Res­i­dents men­tioned that a few young peo­ple had be­come very ill since the oil spill. They were not sure if the oil spill was to blame.Trust is a two-way street. The res­i­dents, and this colum­nist, do not trust the au­thor­i­ties or Petrotrin with re­gard to the events that led up to the oil spill or the clean up event that took place af­ter­wards.

It is cer­tain that no prop­er en­vi­ron­men­tal as­sess­ment or re­me­di­a­tion can have tak­en place with­out the NEATF re­port.I per­son­al­ly risked my health by re­port­ing on the oil spill at a time when Petrotrin was do­ing every­thing in its pow­er to de­ny the ex­tent of the oil spill. Hun­dreds of oth­ers did much more than I did and ex­posed them­selves to harm­ful tox­ins.

Com­mu­ni­ties and ecosys­tems were as­sault­ed and in­sult­ed by the spill. It is time to re­gain our trust by pre­sent­ing the com­plet­ed NEATF re­port so that the ex­perts can as­sure us that com­mu­ni­ties and ecosys­tems are not at risk and that prop­er re­me­di­a­tion is tak­ing place. Is a promise a promise? Or is a promise bro­ken?


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored