JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

I Promise. I Promise. ‘You Can’t Cheat A Pandemic’

by

1307 days ago
20211207

Dr Jonathan Smith

Ed­i­tor’s note: Dr Jonathan Smith orig­i­nal­ly wrote the piece be­low as a let­ter to his lo­cal neigh­bour­hood of about 50 fam­i­lies. It struck a chord, and his neigh­bours be­gan shar­ing it wide­ly with­in their own net­works. Short­ly af­ter, and many tens of thou­sands of email for­wards lat­er, it went vi­ral. Smith, a lec­tur­er in epi­demi­ol­o­gy at Yale Uni­ver­si­ty who is cur­rent­ly com­plet­ing his PhD in epi­demi­ol­o­gy at Emory Uni­ver­si­ty, gra­cious­ly grant­ed per­mis­sion to re­post the piece. This piece was writ­ten in 2020 at the be­gin­ning of the pan­dem­ic and pub­lished on WBUR: Boston Uni­ver­si­ty

As an in­fec­tious dis­ease epi­demi­ol­o­gist, I feel moral­ly ob­lig­at­ed to pro­vide in­for­ma­tion on what we are see­ing from a trans­mis­sion dy­nam­ic per­spec­tive and how it ap­plies to the so­cial dis­tanc­ing mea­sures. Like any good sci­en­tist, I have no­ticed two things that are ei­ther not well ar­tic­u­lat­ed or not present in the “lit­er­a­ture” of on­line me­dia. (I have al­so re­lied on oth­er in­fec­tious dis­ease epi­demi­ol­o­gists for peer re­view of this piece.)

Specif­i­cal­ly, I want to make two as­pects of these dis­tanc­ing mea­sures very clear and un­am­bigu­ous.

First, we are in the very in­fan­cy of this epi­dem­ic’s tra­jec­to­ry. That means that even with these mea­sures in place, we will see cas­es and deaths con­tin­ue to rise glob­al­ly, na­tion­al­ly, and in our own com­mu­ni­ties. This may lead some to think that the so­cial dis­tanc­ing mea­sures are not work­ing. They are. They may feel fu­tile. They aren’t. You will feel dis­cour­aged. You should. This is nor­mal in chaos. This is the nor­mal epi­dem­ic tra­jec­to­ry. Stay calm.

The en­e­my we are fac­ing is very good at what it does; we are not fail­ing. We need every­one to hold the line as the epi­dem­ic in­evitably gets worse. This is not an opin­ion. This is the un­for­giv­ing math of epi­demics for which I and my col­leagues have ded­i­cat­ed our lives to un­der­stand­ing with great nu­ance, and this dis­ease is no ex­cep­tion. Stay strong and in sol­i­dar­i­ty know­ing that what you are do­ing is sav­ing lives, even as peo­ple con­tin­ue get­ting sick and dy­ing. You may feel like giv­ing in. Don’t.

We need every­one to hold the line as the pan­dem­ic in­evitably gets worse. This is not an opin­ion. This is the un­for­giv­ing math...

Sec­ond, al­though so­cial dis­tanc­ing mea­sures have been (at least tem­porar­i­ly) well-re­ceived, there is an ob­vi­ous-but-over­looked phe­nom­e­non when con­sid­er­ing groups (that is, house­holds) in trans­mis­sion dy­nam­ics. While so­cial dis­tanc­ing de­creas­es con­tact with mem­bers of so­ci­ety, it, of course, in­creas­es con­tact with­in a group (that is, fam­i­ly). This small and ob­vi­ous fact has sur­pris­ing­ly pro­found im­pli­ca­tions on dis­ease trans­mis­sion dy­nam­ics.

The ba­sic me­chan­ics of this math­e­mat­i­cal prin­ci­ple dic­tate that even if there is on­ly a lit­tle bit of ad­di­tion­al con­nec­tion be­tween groups (that is, so­cial din­ners, play­dates, un­nec­es­sary trips to the store, etcetera), the pan­dem­ic like­ly won’t be much dif­fer­ent than if there was no mea­sure in place. The same un­der­ly­ing fun­da­men­tals of dis­ease trans­mis­sion ap­ply, and the re­sult is that the com­mu­ni­ty is left with all of the so­cial and eco­nom­ic dis­rup­tion but very lit­tle pub­lic health ben­e­fit.

You should per­ceive your en­tire fam­i­ly to func­tion as a sin­gle in­di­vid­ual unit: If one per­son puts them­selves at risk, every­one in the unit is at risk. Seem­ing­ly small so­cial chains get large and com­plex with alarm­ing speed. If your son vis­its his girl­friend, and you lat­er sneak over for cof­fee with a neigh­bour, your neigh­bour is now con­nect­ed to the in­fect­ed of­fice work­er that your son’s girl­friend’s moth­er shook hands with. This sounds sil­ly, it’s not. This is not a joke or hy­po­thet­i­cal. We as epi­demi­ol­o­gists see it borne out in the da­ta time and time again. Con­verse­ly, any break in that chain breaks dis­ease trans­mis­sion along that chain.

This out­break will not be over­come in one grand, sweep­ing ges­ture, but rather by the col­lec­tion of in­di­vid­ual choic­es we make in the com­ing months.

In con­trast to hand-wash­ing and oth­er per­son­al mea­sures, so­cial dis­tanc­ing mea­sures are not about in­di­vid­u­als, they are about so­ci­eties work­ing in uni­son. These mea­sures al­so re­quire sus­tained ac­tion be­fore re­sults are ev­i­dent. It is hard (even for me) to con­cep­tu­al­ize how on a pop­u­la­tion lev­el “one quick lit­tle get to­geth­er” can un­der­mine the en­tire frame­work of a pub­lic health in­ter­ven­tion, but it can. I promise you it can. I promise. I promise. I promise. You can’t cheat it. Peo­ple are al­ready itch­ing to cheat on the so­cial dis­tanc­ing pre­cau­tions just a “lit­tle” — a short play­date, a quick hair­cut, or pick­ing up a need­less item from the store. From a trans­mis­sion dy­nam­ics stand­point, this very quick­ly recre­ates a high­ly con­nect­ed so­cial net­work that un­der­mines much of the good work our com­mu­ni­ties have done thus far.

This virus is un­for­giv­ing to un­wise choic­es. As this epi­dem­ic con­tin­ues, it will be easy to be drawn to the idea that what we are do­ing isn’t work­ing and we may feel com­pelled to “cheat” with un­nec­es­sary breach­es of so­cial dis­tanc­ing mea­sures. By know­ing what to ex­pect, and know­ing the crit­i­cal im­por­tance of main­tain­ing these mea­sures, my hope is to en­cour­age con­tin­ued com­mu­ni­ty spir­it and strate­giz­ing to per­se­vere in this time of un­cer­tain­ty.

Jonathan Smith, a lec­tur­er in epi­demi­ol­o­gy at Yale Uni­ver­si­ty, is com­plet­ing his PhD in epi­demi­ol­o­gy at Emory Uni­ver­si­ty. His re­search fo­cus­es specif­i­cal­ly on dif­fer­en­tial trans­mis­si­bil­i­ty of in­fec­tious dis­eases un­der var­i­ous pop­u­la­tion-lev­el and in­di­vid­ual-lev­el con­trol mea­sures.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored